| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <557FD1F3.7050705@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 09:36:19 +0200
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: Marcus Gelderie <redmnic@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: mtk.manpages@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, dledford@...hat.com,
John Duffy <jb_duffy@...nternet.com>,
Arto Bendiken <arto@...diken.net>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipc: Modify message queue accounting to reflect both
total user data and auxiliary kernel data
[Added a couple of people into CC that I know are interested/participated
in past discussions that were related. Also added linux-api@...r.kernel.org]
Background for those new to the topic:
The pseudofiles in the mqueue filesystem (usually mounted at
/dev/mqueue) expose fields with metadata describing a message
queue. One of these fields, QSIZE, as originally implemented,
showed the total number of bytes of user data in all messages in
the message queue, and this feature was documented from the
beginning in the mq_overview(7) page. In 3.5, some other (useful)
work happened to break the user-space API in a couple of places,
including the value exposed via QSIZE, which now includes a measure
of kernel overhead bytes for the queue, a figure that renders QSIZE
useless for its original purpose, since there's no way to deduce
the number of overhead bytes consumed by the implementation.
(The other user-space breakage was subsequently fixed.)
Hi Marcus,
On 06/13/2015 09:40 PM, Marcus Gelderie wrote:
> A while back, the message queue implementation in the kernel was
> improved to use btrees to speed up retrieval of messages (commit
> d6629859b36). The patch introducing the improved kernel handling of
> message queues has, as a by-product, changed the meaning of the
> QSIZE field in the pseudo-file created for the queue. Before, this
> field reflected the size of the user-data in the queue. Since, it
> now also takes kernel data structures into account, this is no no longer
> true. For example, if 13 bytes of user data are in the queue, on my
> machine the file reports a size of 61 bytes.
Thanks for taking a look at this. This user-space breakage been one of
those nagging things I've wanted to see fixed for a while now, and since
the earlier discussion, I've heard from one or two people who were
unpleasantly surprised by this API change.
> There was some discussion on this topic before (for example
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/1/115). Reporting the size of the
> message queue in kernel has its merits, but doing so in the QSIZE
> field of the pseudo file corresponding to the queue is a breaking
> change. This patch therefore returns the QSIZE field to its original
> meaning. At the same time, it introduces a new field QKERSIZE that
> reflects the size of the queue in kernel (user data + kernel data).
>
> If the accounting should be improved, I'd be happy to take a look at
> that, too. I would propose to do that in terms of the newly introduced
> field.
The general approach seems good to me. Making the new QKERSIZE the last
field, as you have done, so that any applications that were parsing
an mqueue file in a really dumb fashion (by ordinal position, rather
than checking field names) seems good to me.
Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk,manpages@...il.com>
Assuming this approach is acceptable, this patch should eventually go
to stable@ so it is backported to older stable kernels. In the event
that you need to resubmit the patch, I suggest including some of the
background detail I give above in the commit message.
Cheers,
Michael
> Signed-off-by: Marcus Gelderie <redmnic@...il.com>
> ---
> ipc/mqueue.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ipc/mqueue.c b/ipc/mqueue.c
> index 3aaea7f..7d4c464 100644
> --- a/ipc/mqueue.c
> +++ b/ipc/mqueue.c
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
>
> #define MQUEUE_MAGIC 0x19800202
> #define DIRENT_SIZE 20
> -#define FILENT_SIZE 80
> +#define FILENT_SIZE 90
>
> #define SEND 0
> #define RECV 1
> @@ -82,8 +82,12 @@ struct mqueue_inode_info {
> /* for tasks waiting for free space and messages, respectively */
> struct ext_wait_queue e_wait_q[2];
>
> - unsigned long qsize; /* size of queue in memory (sum of all msgs) */
> -};
> + /* size of queue in memory (sum of all msgs plus kernel
> + * data structures) */
> + unsigned long qsize;
> +
> + /* size of user data in the queue (sum of all msgs) */
> + unsigned long q_usersize; };
>
> static const struct inode_operations mqueue_dir_inode_operations;
> static const struct file_operations mqueue_file_operations;
> @@ -151,6 +155,7 @@ static int msg_insert(struct msg_msg *msg, struct mqueue_inode_info *info)
> insert_msg:
> info->attr.mq_curmsgs++;
> info->qsize += msg->m_ts;
> + info->q_usersize += msg->m_ts;
> list_add_tail(&msg->m_list, &leaf->msg_list);
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -210,6 +215,7 @@ try_again:
> }
> info->attr.mq_curmsgs--;
> info->qsize -= msg->m_ts;
> + info->q_usersize -= msg->m_ts;
> return msg;
> }
>
> @@ -246,6 +252,7 @@ static struct inode *mqueue_get_inode(struct super_block *sb,
> info->notify_owner = NULL;
> info->notify_user_ns = NULL;
> info->qsize = 0;
> + info->q_usersize = 0;
> info->user = NULL; /* set when all is ok */
> info->msg_tree = RB_ROOT;
> info->node_cache = NULL;
> @@ -491,13 +498,14 @@ static ssize_t mqueue_read_file(struct file *filp, char __user *u_data,
>
> spin_lock(&info->lock);
> snprintf(buffer, sizeof(buffer),
> - "QSIZE:%-10lu NOTIFY:%-5d SIGNO:%-5d NOTIFY_PID:%-6d\n",
> - info->qsize,
> + "QSIZE:%-10lu NOTIFY:%-5d SIGNO:%-5d NOTIFY_PID:%-6d QKERSIZE:%-10lu\n",
> + info->q_usersize,
> info->notify_owner ? info->notify.sigev_notify : 0,
> (info->notify_owner &&
> info->notify.sigev_notify == SIGEV_SIGNAL) ?
> info->notify.sigev_signo : 0,
> - pid_vnr(info->notify_owner));
> + pid_vnr(info->notify_owner),
> + info->qsize);
> spin_unlock(&info->lock);
> buffer[sizeof(buffer)-1] = '\0';
>
>
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists