[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <557F8E04.7000209@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 19:46:28 -0700
From: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
jwboyer@...hat.com, smueller@...onox.de, richard@....at,
steved@...hat.com, qat-linux@...el.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, james.l.morris@...cle.com,
jkosina@...e.cz, zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
vgoyal@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v5 2/4] crypto: add PKE API
On 06/15/2015 07:29 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> I thought that the ctx needs to be available for implementations to store private data.
>> > This way we can allocate and store any type of key in the <alg>_parse_key() helper and still have the cxt
>> > available for implementations to use for their stuff (e.g. HW context).
> No for symmetric key algorithms we always store the key in the
> context and never in the tfm proper.
>
> Think about it, the generic tfm doesn't have any idea on what
> the key contains so how can it store it? Only the implementation
> knows the key format and can store it in a useful way.
Ok I wanted to handle everything in the parse_key helper without any help from the implementation.
I can change the helper to return the key and implementation will store it in the ctx. Is this
what you are suggesting?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists