[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150616092136.GL3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:21:36 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Imre Palik <imrep.amz@...il.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Palik, Imre" <imrep@...zon.de>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf: honoring the architectural performance
monitoring version
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 04:22:32PM +0200, Imre Palik wrote:
> From: "Palik, Imre" <imrep@...zon.de>
>
> Architectural performance monitoring version 1 doesn't support fixed
> counters. Currently, even if a hypervisor advertises support for
> architectural performance monitoring version 1, perf may still tries to use
> the fixed counters, as the constraints are set up based on the CPU model.
>
> This patch ensures that perf honors the architectural performance
> monitoring version returned by CPUID, and it only uses the fixed counters
> for version two and above.
>
> Some of the ideas in this patch are coming from Peter Zijlstra.
What's the difference from -v2? I'm not really seeing it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists