linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v5 2/4] crypto: add PKE API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <557F9035.80500@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Jun 2015 19:55:49 -0700
From:	Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...el.com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
	jwboyer@...hat.com, smueller@...onox.de, richard@....at,
	steved@...hat.com, qat-linux@...el.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, james.l.morris@...cle.com,
	jkosina@...e.cz, zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	vgoyal@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v5 2/4] crypto: add PKE API

On 06/15/2015 07:50 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> If you want to keep the helper generic what you can do is have
> it take struct rsa_key instead of struct crypto_ablkcipher.

Ok I'll do it that way.

> 
> It definitely should just be an optional helper as opposed to
> a required part of crypto_akcipher since you could have a piece
> of hardware that takes the encoded key directly in which case
> you wouldn't need the helper at all.

Oh yes, it is definitely optional.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/