linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/6] mm, compaction: encapsulate resetting cached scanner positions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <558012E8.8090605@suse.cz>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:13:28 +0200
From:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] mm, compaction: encapsulate resetting cached scanner
 positions

On 06/16/2015 07:41 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:32:31AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> Resetting the cached compaction scanner positions is now done implicitly in
>> __reset_isolation_suitable() and compact_finished(). Encapsulate the
>> functionality in a new function reset_cached_positions() and call it explicitly
>> where needed.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
>> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
>> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
>> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
>> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
>> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
>> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/compaction.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
>> index 7e0a814..d334bb3 100644
>> --- a/mm/compaction.c
>> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
>> @@ -207,6 +207,13 @@ static inline bool isolation_suitable(struct compact_control *cc,
>>  	return !get_pageblock_skip(page);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void reset_cached_positions(struct zone *zone)
>> +{
>> +	zone->compact_cached_migrate_pfn[0] = zone->zone_start_pfn;
>> +	zone->compact_cached_migrate_pfn[1] = zone->zone_start_pfn;
>> +	zone->compact_cached_free_pfn = zone_end_pfn(zone);
>> +}
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * This function is called to clear all cached information on pageblocks that
>>   * should be skipped for page isolation when the migrate and free page scanner
>> @@ -218,9 +225,6 @@ static void __reset_isolation_suitable(struct zone *zone)
>>  	unsigned long end_pfn = zone_end_pfn(zone);
>>  	unsigned long pfn;
>>  
>> -	zone->compact_cached_migrate_pfn[0] = start_pfn;
>> -	zone->compact_cached_migrate_pfn[1] = start_pfn;
>> -	zone->compact_cached_free_pfn = end_pfn;
>>  	zone->compact_blockskip_flush = false;
> 
> Is there a valid reason not to call reset_cached_positions() in
> __reset_isolation_suitable?

Hm maybe not, except being somewhat implicit again. It might had a stronger
reason in the previous patchset.

> You missed one callsite in
> __compact_pgdat().
> 
>         if (cc->order == -1)
>                 __reset_isolation_suitable(zone);
> 
> This also needs reset_cached_positions().

Ah, good catch. Thanks.

> 
> Thanks.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/