[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55802F94.90306@citrix.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 15:15:48 +0100
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] x86/virt/guest/xen: Remove use of pgd_list from
the Xen guest code
On 15/06/15 21:35, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com> wrote:
>
>> On 15/06/15 10:05, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2015-06-13 at 11:49 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>>>> xen_mm_pin_all()/unpin_all() are used to implement full guest instance
>>>> suspend/restore. It's a stop-all method that needs to iterate through all
>>>> allocated pgds in the system to fix them up for Xen's use.
>>>>
>>>> This code uses pgd_list, probably because it was an easy interface.
>>>>
>>>> But we want to remove the pgd_list, so convert the code over to walk all
>>>> tasks in the system. This is an equivalent method.
>>
>> It is not equivalent because pgd_alloc() now populates entries in pgds that are
>> not visible to xen_mm_pin_all() (note how the original code adds the pgd to the
>> pgd_list in pgd_ctor() before calling pgd_prepopulate_pmd()). These newly
>> allocated page tables won't be correctly converted on suspend/resume and the new
>> process will die after resume.
>
> So how should the Xen logic be fixed for the new scheme? I can't say I can see
> through the paravirt complexity here.
Actually, since we freeze_processes() before trying to pin page tables,
I think it should be ok as-is.
I'll put the patch through some tests.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists