lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:18:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com> cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com, david.vrabel@...rix.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, akataria@...are.com, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, gleb@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86: reduce paravirtualized spinlock overhead On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Juergen Gross wrote: > AFAIK there are no outstanding questions for more than one month now. > I'd appreciate some feedback or accepting these patches. They are against dead code, which will be gone soon. We switched over to queued locks. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists