linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86: reduce paravirtualized spinlock overhead

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1506161716050.4120@nanos>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jun 2015 17:18:32 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
	david.vrabel@...rix.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, akataria@...are.com,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, gleb@...nel.org,
	pbonzini@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86: reduce paravirtualized spinlock overhead

On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, Juergen Gross wrote:

> AFAIK there are no outstanding questions for more than one month now.
> I'd appreciate some feedback or accepting these patches.

They are against dead code, which will be gone soon. We switched over
to queued locks.

Thanks,

	tglx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/