[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55808579.4050004@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 13:22:17 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: brgerst@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, bp@...en8.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, dvlasenk@...hat.com,
luto@...capital.net, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/asm] x86/asm/entry: (Re-) rename __NR_entry_INT80_compat_max
to __NR_syscall_compat_max
On 06/08/2015 03:24 PM, tip-bot for Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Commit-ID: bace7117d3fb59a6ed7ea1aa6c8994df6a28a72a
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/bace7117d3fb59a6ed7ea1aa6c8994df6a28a72a
> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> AuthorDate: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 21:20:26 +0200
> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> CommitDate: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 23:43:38 +0200
>
> x86/asm/entry: (Re-)rename __NR_entry_INT80_compat_max to __NR_syscall_compat_max
>
> Brian Gerst noticed that I did a weird rename in the following commit:
>
> b2502b418e63 ("x86/asm/entry: Untangle 'system_call' into two entry points: entry_SYSCALL_64 and entry_INT80_32")
>
> which renamed __NR_ia32_syscall_max to __NR_entry_INT80_compat_max.
>
> Now the original name was a misnomer, but the new one is a misnomer as well,
> as all the 32-bit compat syscall entry points (sysenter, syscall) share the
> system call table, not just the INT80 based one.
>
> Rename it to __NR_syscall_compat_max.
>
The original one wasn't really a misnomer, as it referred to the ia32
system calls specifically, but this works too.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists