[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150616230700-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 23:07:24 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] vhost: use binary search instead of linear in
find_region()
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 06:33:35PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> For default region layouts performance stays the same
> as linear search i.e. it takes around 210ns average for
> translate_desc() that inlines find_region().
>
> But it scales better with larger amount of regions,
> 235ns BS vs 300ns LS with 55 memory regions
> and it will be about the same values when allowed number
> of slots is increased to 509 like it has been done in kvm.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index 2ee2826..a22f8c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> #include <linux/kthread.h>
> #include <linux/cgroup.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/sort.h>
>
> #include "vhost.h"
>
> @@ -590,6 +591,16 @@ int vhost_vq_access_ok(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_vq_access_ok);
>
> +static int vhost_memory_reg_sort_cmp(const void *p1, const void *p2)
> +{
> + const struct vhost_memory_region *r1 = p1, *r2 = p2;
> + if (r1->guest_phys_addr < r2->guest_phys_addr)
> + return 1;
> + if (r1->guest_phys_addr > r2->guest_phys_addr)
> + return -1;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static long vhost_set_memory(struct vhost_dev *d, struct vhost_memory __user *m)
> {
> struct vhost_memory mem, *newmem, *oldmem;
> @@ -609,9 +620,11 @@ static long vhost_set_memory(struct vhost_dev *d, struct vhost_memory __user *m)
> memcpy(newmem, &mem, size);
> if (copy_from_user(newmem->regions, m->regions,
> mem.nregions * sizeof *m->regions)) {
> - kfree(newmem);
> + kvfree(newmem);
> return -EFAULT;
> }
What's this doing here?
> + sort(newmem->regions, newmem->nregions, sizeof(*newmem->regions),
> + vhost_memory_reg_sort_cmp, NULL);
>
> if (!memory_access_ok(d, newmem, 0)) {
> kfree(newmem);
> @@ -913,17 +926,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vhost_dev_ioctl);
> static const struct vhost_memory_region *find_region(struct vhost_memory *mem,
> __u64 addr, __u32 len)
> {
> - struct vhost_memory_region *reg;
> - int i;
> + const struct vhost_memory_region *reg;
> + int start = 0, end = mem->nregions;
>
> - /* linear search is not brilliant, but we really have on the order of 6
> - * regions in practice */
> - for (i = 0; i < mem->nregions; ++i) {
> - reg = mem->regions + i;
> - if (reg->guest_phys_addr <= addr &&
> - reg->guest_phys_addr + reg->memory_size - 1 >= addr)
> - return reg;
> + while (start < end) {
> + int slot = start + (end - start) / 2;
> + reg = mem->regions + slot;
> + if (addr >= reg->guest_phys_addr)
> + end = slot;
> + else
> + start = slot + 1;
> }
> +
> + reg = mem->regions + start;
> + if (addr >= reg->guest_phys_addr &&
> + reg->guest_phys_addr + reg->memory_size > addr)
> + return reg;
> return NULL;
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists