| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <55810B70.2060409@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:53:52 +0800
From: Zhu Guihua <zhugh.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1] x86, espfix: postpone the initialization of espfix
stack for AP
Any feedback about this?
On 06/04/2015 05:45 PM, Gu Zheng wrote:
> The following lockdep warning occurrs when running with latest kernel:
> [ 3.178000] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 3.183000] WARNING: CPU: 128 PID: 0 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2755 lockdep_trace_alloc+0xdd/0xe0()
> [ 3.193000] DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(irqs_disabled_flags(flags))
> [ 3.199000] Modules linked in:
>
> [ 3.203000] CPU: 128 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/128 Not tainted 4.1.0-rc3 #70
> [ 3.221000] 0000000000000000 2d6601fb3e6d4e4c ffff88086fd5fc38 ffffffff81773f0a
> [ 3.230000] 0000000000000000 ffff88086fd5fc90 ffff88086fd5fc78 ffffffff8108c85a
> [ 3.238000] ffff88086fd60000 0000000000000092 ffff88086fd60000 00000000000000d0
> [ 3.246000] Call Trace:
> [ 3.249000] [<ffffffff81773f0a>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
> [ 3.255000] [<ffffffff8108c85a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8a/0xc0
> [ 3.261000] [<ffffffff8108c8e5>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x55/0x70
> [ 3.268000] [<ffffffff810ee24d>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0xdd/0xe0
> [ 3.274000] [<ffffffff811cda0d>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0xad/0xca0
> [ 3.281000] [<ffffffff810ec7ad>] ? __lock_acquire+0xf6d/0x1560
> [ 3.288000] [<ffffffff81219c8a>] alloc_page_interleave+0x3a/0x90
> [ 3.295000] [<ffffffff8121b32d>] alloc_pages_current+0x17d/0x1a0
> [ 3.301000] [<ffffffff811c869e>] ? __get_free_pages+0xe/0x50
> [ 3.308000] [<ffffffff811c869e>] __get_free_pages+0xe/0x50
> [ 3.314000] [<ffffffff8102640b>] init_espfix_ap+0x17b/0x320
> [ 3.320000] [<ffffffff8105c691>] start_secondary+0xf1/0x1f0
> [ 3.327000] ---[ end trace 1b3327d9d6a1d62c ]---
>
> As we alloc pages with GFP_KERNEL in init_espfix_ap() which is called
> before enabled local irq, and the lockdep sub-system considers this
> behaviour as allocating memory with GFP_FS with local irq disabled,
> then trigger the warning as mentioned about.
>
> Though we could allocate them on the boot CPU side and hand them over to
> the secondary CPU, but it seemes a bit waste if some of cpus are offline.
> As thers is no need to these pages(espfix stack) until we try to run user
> code, so we postpone the initialization of espfix stack, and let the boot
> up routine init the espfix stack for the target cpu after it booted to
> avoid the noise.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> v1:
> Alloc the page on the node the target CPU is on.
> RFC:
> Let the boot up routine init the espfix stack for the target cpu after it
> booted.
> ---
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/espfix.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/espfix.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/espfix.h
> index 99efebb..ca3ce9a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/espfix.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/espfix.h
> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long, espfix_stack);
> DECLARE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(unsigned long, espfix_waddr);
>
> extern void init_espfix_bsp(void);
> -extern void init_espfix_ap(void);
> +extern void init_espfix_ap(int cpu);
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
> index f5d0730..e397583 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c
> @@ -131,25 +131,24 @@ void __init init_espfix_bsp(void)
> init_espfix_random();
>
> /* The rest is the same as for any other processor */
> - init_espfix_ap();
> + init_espfix_ap(0);
> }
>
> -void init_espfix_ap(void)
> +void init_espfix_ap(int cpu)
> {
> - unsigned int cpu, page;
> + unsigned int page;
> unsigned long addr;
> pud_t pud, *pud_p;
> pmd_t pmd, *pmd_p;
> pte_t pte, *pte_p;
> - int n;
> + int n, node;
> void *stack_page;
> pteval_t ptemask;
>
> /* We only have to do this once... */
> - if (likely(this_cpu_read(espfix_stack)))
> + if (likely(per_cpu(espfix_stack, cpu)))
> return; /* Already initialized */
>
> - cpu = smp_processor_id();
> addr = espfix_base_addr(cpu);
> page = cpu/ESPFIX_STACKS_PER_PAGE;
>
> @@ -165,12 +164,15 @@ void init_espfix_ap(void)
> if (stack_page)
> goto unlock_done;
>
> + node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
> ptemask = __supported_pte_mask;
>
> pud_p = &espfix_pud_page[pud_index(addr)];
> pud = *pud_p;
> if (!pud_present(pud)) {
> - pmd_p = (pmd_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> + struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> +
> + pmd_p = (pmd_t *)page_address(page);
> pud = __pud(__pa(pmd_p) | (PGTABLE_PROT & ptemask));
> paravirt_alloc_pmd(&init_mm, __pa(pmd_p) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> for (n = 0; n < ESPFIX_PUD_CLONES; n++)
> @@ -180,7 +182,9 @@ void init_espfix_ap(void)
> pmd_p = pmd_offset(&pud, addr);
> pmd = *pmd_p;
> if (!pmd_present(pmd)) {
> - pte_p = (pte_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP);
> + struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, PGALLOC_GFP, 0);
> +
> + pte_p = (pte_t *)page_address(page);
> pmd = __pmd(__pa(pte_p) | (PGTABLE_PROT & ptemask));
> paravirt_alloc_pte(&init_mm, __pa(pte_p) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> for (n = 0; n < ESPFIX_PMD_CLONES; n++)
> @@ -188,7 +192,7 @@ void init_espfix_ap(void)
> }
>
> pte_p = pte_offset_kernel(&pmd, addr);
> - stack_page = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> + stack_page = page_address(alloc_pages_node(node, GFP_KERNEL, 0));
> pte = __pte(__pa(stack_page) | (__PAGE_KERNEL_RO & ptemask));
> for (n = 0; n < ESPFIX_PTE_CLONES; n++)
> set_pte(&pte_p[n*PTE_STRIDE], pte);
> @@ -199,7 +203,7 @@ void init_espfix_ap(void)
> unlock_done:
> mutex_unlock(&espfix_init_mutex);
> done:
> - this_cpu_write(espfix_stack, addr);
> - this_cpu_write(espfix_waddr, (unsigned long)stack_page
> - + (addr & ~PAGE_MASK));
> + per_cpu(espfix_stack, cpu) = addr;
> + per_cpu(espfix_waddr, cpu) = (unsigned long)stack_page
> + + (addr & ~PAGE_MASK);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index 50e547e..e9fdd0e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -240,13 +240,6 @@ static void notrace start_secondary(void *unused)
> check_tsc_sync_target();
>
> /*
> - * Enable the espfix hack for this CPU
> - */
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_ESPFIX64
> - init_espfix_ap();
> -#endif
> -
> - /*
> * We need to hold vector_lock so there the set of online cpus
> * does not change while we are assigning vectors to cpus. Holding
> * this lock ensures we don't half assign or remove an irq from a cpu.
> @@ -901,6 +894,13 @@ static int do_boot_cpu(int apicid, int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
> }
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Enable the espfix hack for this CPU
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_ESPFIX64
> + init_espfix_ap(cpu);
> +#endif
> +
> /* mark "stuck" area as not stuck */
> *trampoline_status = 0;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists