[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150617091503.5f74b6e5@bbrezillon>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 09:15:03 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, Arnaud Ebalard <arno@...isbad.org>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@...vell.com>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@...vell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>,
Eran Ben-Avi <benavi@...vell.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Imre Kaloz <kaloz@...nwrt.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/14] crypto: marvell/CESA: add TDMA support
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:56:33 +0800
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 01:05:27PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:58:59AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > >
> > > + ret = dma_map_sg(cesa_dev->dev, req->src, creq->src_nents,
> > > + DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > > + if (ret != creq->src_nents)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > Hmm it doesn't quite work like that. It returns zero on error,
> > otherwise it returns the number (n) of mapped entries which may be
> > less than what you gave it due to merging. You're then supposed
> > to use only the first n entries which should contain everything.
>
> Please take a look at Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt, it has
> everything you need to know about the dma_map_sg interface.
Yep, I read it, but apparently not carefully enough ;-).
I'll fix that.
Note that I did not ignore your previous comment on purpose (checking
for !ret to verify if the sg entries were successfully mapped), but I
have a specific case in the hash code where the requested len is 0
(final request) and thus the src_nents is 0 too. Which means I'm
expecting the dma_sg_map to return 0.
Anyway, now I'm doing the following test:
if (creq->src_nents && !ret)
return -ENOMEM;
Best Regards,
Boris
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists