[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1434531244.2069.111.camel@x220>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 10:54:04 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: York Sun <yorksun@...escale.com>
Cc: wsa@...-dreams.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver/i2c/mux: Add register based mux i2c-mux-reg
A nit and a question follow.
On Tue, 2015-06-16 at 10:28 -0700, York Sun wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-reg.c
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
This states the license is GPL v2.
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
According to include/linux/module.h this sates the license is GPL v2 or
later. So I think that either the comment at the top of this file or the
ident used in the MODULE_LICENSE() macro needs to change.
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:i2c-mux-reg");
As far as I understand it, this alias is only useful if there's a
corresponding struct platform_device, somewhere. Ie, this alias needs a
platform_device that will fire of a "MODALIAS=platform:i2c-mux-reg"
uevent when it's created. (I don't know exactly how all that works, so
I'm handwaving quite a bit here.) That would be platform_device with a
"i2c-mux-reg" name.
Did I get this right? Because then I think this MODULE_ALIAS() isn't
needed, as I couldn't find such a corresponding platform_device.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists