linux-kernel - Re: Regression in 3.10.80 vs. 3.10.79

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1623864.KkKcV5nVxn@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:42:40 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: Regression in 3.10.80 vs. 3.10.79

On Tuesday, June 16, 2015 01:00:13 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, June 15, 2015 07:56:05 AM Roland Dreier wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com> wrote:
> > > Below is a more sophisticated, so to speak, version of it with a changelog and
> > > all.  It works for me, but more testing would be much appreciated.
> > 
> > Yes, the patch works as expected:
> > 
> > Tested-by: Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>
> 
> Awesome, thanks a lot for the confirmation!

During the final review of the patch I noticed that it could be simplified
by dropping the acpi_add_region_after() routine and calling acpi_add_region()
directly instead of it.

I'll send an updated patch to you later today.

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/