[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <558176AF.8070109@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:31:27 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/18] x86/kvm/tsc: Drop extra barrier and use rdtsc_ordered
in kvmclock
On 17/06/2015 09:47, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 17/06/2015 02:36, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> __pvclock_read_cycles had an unnecessary barrier. Get rid of that
>> barrier and clean up the code by just using rdtsc_ordered().
>>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
>> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
>> Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
>> ---
>>
>> I'm hoping to get an ack for this to go in through -tip. (Arguably
>> I'm the maintainer of this code given how it's used, but I should
>> still ask for an ack.)
>>
>> arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h | 21 ++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> Can you send a URL to the rest of the series? I've never even seen v1
> or v2 so I have no idea of what this is about.
Ah, it was sent to the KVM list, just not CCed to me. :)
Sorry, that's what you get when your unread message count does not fit
in three digits anymore.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists