linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers/cpufreq: include <module.h> for modular exynos-cpufreq.c code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <5580C0FE.5010502@samsung.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Jun 2015 09:36:14 +0900
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/cpufreq: include <module.h> for modular
 exynos-cpufreq.c code

On 17.06.2015 00:29, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On 15-06-15 07:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16.06.2015 08:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, June 03, 2015 05:18:18 PM Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>>>> This file is built off of a tristate Kconfig option ("ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ")
>>>> and also contains modular function calls so it should explicitly include
>>>> module.h to avoid compile breakage during pending header shuffles.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
>>>> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
>>>> Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
>>>> Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
>>>> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>>>> Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
>>>
>>> I'm assuming that this will go in via the Samsung tree.
>>>
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> [ patch will be appended to the implicit include fixup series, see:
>>>>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1430444867-22342-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com
>>>>   for the original series posting.]
>>
>> Paul, will you handle the patch or should it go through Samsung tree?
> 
> 
> I have to keep a copy of the patch in the above series, since if
> I don't then we'll introduce build failures into the bisection
> history, so yes I'll handle it.

Thank you, I'll leave the patch for you to handle.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/