lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150617133002.GW10428@rric.localhost>
Date:	Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:30:02 +0200
From:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@...iumnetworks.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>,
	Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@...ium.com>,
	<linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	<kbuild-all@...org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ahci, msix: Fix build error for !PCI_MSI

Tejun, Gerry,

On 17.06.15 17:02:20, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2015/6/17 16:48, Robert Richter wrote:

> >  static struct msi_desc *msix_get_desc(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 entry)
> >  {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
> >  	struct msi_desc *desc;
> >  
> >  	list_for_each_entry(desc, &dev->msi_list, list) {
> >  		if (desc->msi_attrib.entry_nr == entry)
> >  			return desc;
> >  	}
> > -
> > +#endif

> Hi Robert,
> 	While at it, could you please help to use  for_each_pci_msi_entry()
> from include/linux/msi.h instead of hard-coding? We are trying to refine
> the msi_list related code,
> so we don't need to touch this code again later.

While looking into this I realized the code can be much more
simplified so that the desc lookup function can be removed at all.
See below.

Sorry for the patch noise.

-Robert


>From e43b79f0afd794d3e37ec0922c75e44b1c3f2e22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 10:33:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2] ahci, msix: Fix build error for !PCI_MSI
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

It turned out the irq vector of the msix can be obtained from struct
msix_entry. This makes the lookup function for msi_desc obsolete.

This fixes a build error if PCI_MSI is unset:

 drivers/ata/ahci.c: In function ‘msix_get_desc’:
 drivers/ata/ahci.c:1210:2: error: ‘struct pci_dev’ has no member named ‘msi_list’

Catched by Fengguang's build bot.

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>
---
 drivers/ata/ahci.c | 21 +--------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
index bdedaa4f9d7b..c478a40e32c6 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
@@ -1203,18 +1203,6 @@ static inline void ahci_gtf_filter_workaround(struct ata_host *host)
 {}
 #endif
 
-static struct msi_desc *msix_get_desc(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 entry)
-{
-	struct msi_desc *desc;
-
-	list_for_each_entry(desc, &dev->msi_list, list) {
-		if (desc->msi_attrib.entry_nr == entry)
-			return desc;
-	}
-
-	return NULL;
-}
-
 /*
  * ahci_init_msix() only implements single MSI-X support, not multiple
  * MSI-X per-port interrupts. This is needed for host controllers that only
@@ -1223,7 +1211,6 @@ static struct msi_desc *msix_get_desc(struct pci_dev *dev, u16 entry)
 static int ahci_init_msix(struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int n_ports,
 			  struct ahci_host_priv *hpriv)
 {
-	struct msi_desc *desc;
 	int rc, nvec;
 	struct msix_entry entry = {};
 
@@ -1248,13 +1235,7 @@ static int ahci_init_msix(struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int n_ports,
 	if (rc < 0)
 		goto fail;
 
-	desc = msix_get_desc(pdev, 0);	/* first entry */
-	if (!desc) {
-		rc = -EINVAL;
-		goto fail;
-	}
-
-	hpriv->irq = desc->irq;
+	hpriv->irq = entry.vector;
 
 	return 1;
 fail:
-- 
2.1.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ