[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5581B697.2060800@bjorling.me>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 20:04:07 +0200
From: Matias Bjorling <m@...rling.me>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: Stephen.Bates@...s.com, keith.busch@...el.com, javier@...htnvm.io,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
axboe@...com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] Support for Open-Channel SSDs
> I don't think the current abuses of the block API are acceptable though.
> The crazy deep merging shouldn't be too relevant for SSD-type devices
> so I think you'd do better than trying to reuse the TYPE_FS level
> blk-mq merging code. If you want to reuse the request
> allocation/submission code that's still doable.
>
> As a start add a new submit_io method to the nvm_dev_ops, and add
> an implementation similar to pscsi_execute_cmd in
> drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.c for nvme, and a trivial no op
> for a null-nvm driver replacing the null-blk additions. This
> will give you very similar behavior to your current code, while
> allowing to drop all the hacks in the block code. Note that simple
> plugging will work just fine which should be all you'll need.
>
Thanks, I appreciate you taking the time to go through it. I'll respin
the patches and remove the block hacks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists