linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/8] perf tools: Fix a problem when opening old perf.data with different byte order

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1434576155-30038-3-git-send-email-acme@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 17 Jun 2015 18:22:29 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>, pi3orama@....com,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] perf tools: Fix a problem when opening old perf.data with different byte order

From: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>

Following error occurs when trying to use 'perf report' on x86_64 to
cross analysis a perf.data generated by an old perf on a big-endian
machine:

 # perf report
 *** Error in `/home/w00229757/perf': free(): invalid next size (fast): 0x00000000032c99f0 ***
 ======= Backtrace: =========
 /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x6eeef)[0x7ff6ff7e2eef]
 /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x78cae)[0x7ff6ff7eccae]
 /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x79987)[0x7ff6ff7ed987]
 /path/to/perf[0x4ac734]
 /path/to/perf[0x4ac829]
 /path/to/perf(perf_header__process_sections+0x129)[0x4ad2c9]
 /path/to/perf(perf_session__read_header+0x2e1)[0x4ad9e1]
 /path/to/perf(perf_session__new+0x168)[0x4bd458]
 /path/to/perf(cmd_report+0xfa0)[0x43eb70]
 /path/to/perf[0x47adc3]
 /path/to/perf(main+0x5f6)[0x42fd06]
 /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5)[0x7ff6ff795bd5]
 /path/to/perf[0x42fe35]
 ======= Memory map: ========
 [SNIP]

The bug is in perf_event__attr_swap(). It swaps all fields in 'struct
perf_event_attr' without checking whether the swapped field exist or
not. In addition, in read_event_desc() allocs memory for attr according
to size read from perf.data.

Therefore, if the perf.data is collected by an old perf (without
aux_watermark, for example), when perf_event__attr_swap() swaping
attr->aux_watermark it destroy malloc's metadata.

This patch introduces boundary checking in perf_event__attr_swap(). It
adds macros bswap_field_64 and bswap_field_32 into
perf_event__attr_swap() to make it only swap exist fields.

Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc: pi3orama@....com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1434534999-85347-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/session.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
index f31e024ddf7d..e1cd17c2afab 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
@@ -517,20 +517,42 @@ void perf_event__attr_swap(struct perf_event_attr *attr)
 {
 	attr->type		= bswap_32(attr->type);
 	attr->size		= bswap_32(attr->size);
-	attr->config		= bswap_64(attr->config);
-	attr->sample_period	= bswap_64(attr->sample_period);
-	attr->sample_type	= bswap_64(attr->sample_type);
-	attr->read_format	= bswap_64(attr->read_format);
-	attr->wakeup_events	= bswap_32(attr->wakeup_events);
-	attr->bp_type		= bswap_32(attr->bp_type);
-	attr->bp_addr		= bswap_64(attr->bp_addr);
-	attr->bp_len		= bswap_64(attr->bp_len);
-	attr->branch_sample_type = bswap_64(attr->branch_sample_type);
-	attr->sample_regs_user	 = bswap_64(attr->sample_regs_user);
-	attr->sample_stack_user  = bswap_32(attr->sample_stack_user);
-	attr->aux_watermark	 = bswap_32(attr->aux_watermark);
-
-	swap_bitfield((u8 *) (&attr->read_format + 1), sizeof(u64));
+
+#define bswap_safe(f, n) 					\
+	(attr->size > (offsetof(struct perf_event_attr, f) + 	\
+		       sizeof(attr->f) * (n)))
+#define bswap_field(f, sz) 			\
+do { 						\
+	if (bswap_safe(f, 0))			\
+		attr->f = bswap_##sz(attr->f);	\
+} while(0)
+#define bswap_field_32(f) bswap_field(f, 32)
+#define bswap_field_64(f) bswap_field(f, 64)
+
+	bswap_field_64(config);
+	bswap_field_64(sample_period);
+	bswap_field_64(sample_type);
+	bswap_field_64(read_format);
+	bswap_field_32(wakeup_events);
+	bswap_field_32(bp_type);
+	bswap_field_64(bp_addr);
+	bswap_field_64(bp_len);
+	bswap_field_64(branch_sample_type);
+	bswap_field_64(sample_regs_user);
+	bswap_field_32(sample_stack_user);
+	bswap_field_32(aux_watermark);
+
+	/*
+	 * After read_format are bitfields. Check read_format because
+	 * we are unable to use offsetof on bitfield.
+	 */
+	if (bswap_safe(read_format, 1))
+		swap_bitfield((u8 *) (&attr->read_format + 1),
+			      sizeof(u64));
+#undef bswap_field_64
+#undef bswap_field_32
+#undef bswap_field
+#undef bswap_safe
 }
 
 static void perf_event__hdr_attr_swap(union perf_event *event,
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/