[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1434576393-29598-1-git-send-email-Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 16:26:33 -0500
From: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH V3] mm: kmemleak_alloc_percpu() should follow the gfp from per_alloc()
Beginning at commit d52d3997f843 ("ipv6: Create percpu rt6_info"), the
following INFO splat is logged:
===============================
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
4.1.0-rc7-next-20150612 #1 Not tainted
-------------------------------
kernel/sched/core.c:7318 Illegal context switch in RCU-bh read-side critical section!
other info that might help us debug this:
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
3 locks held by systemd/1:
#0: (rtnl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff815f0c8f>] rtnetlink_rcv+0x1f/0x40
#1: (rcu_read_lock_bh){......}, at: [<ffffffff816a34e2>] ipv6_add_addr+0x62/0x540
#2: (addrconf_hash_lock){+...+.}, at: [<ffffffff816a3604>] ipv6_add_addr+0x184/0x540
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 4.1.0-rc7-next-20150612 #1
Hardware name: TOSHIBA TECRA A50-A/TECRA A50-A, BIOS Version 4.20 04/17/2014
0000000000000001 ffff880224e07838 ffffffff817263a4 ffffffff810ccf2a
ffff880224e08000 ffff880224e07868 ffffffff810b6827 0000000000000000
ffffffff81a445d3 00000000000004f4 ffff88022682e100 ffff880224e07898
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff817263a4>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x6e
[<ffffffff810ccf2a>] ? console_unlock+0x1ca/0x510
[<ffffffff810b6827>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xe7/0x120
[<ffffffff8108cf05>] ___might_sleep+0x1d5/0x1f0
[<ffffffff8108cf6d>] __might_sleep+0x4d/0x90
[<ffffffff811f3789>] ? create_object+0x39/0x2e0
[<ffffffff811da427>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x47/0x250
[<ffffffff813c19ae>] ? find_next_zero_bit+0x1e/0x20
[<ffffffff811f3789>] create_object+0x39/0x2e0
[<ffffffff810b7eb6>] ? mark_held_locks+0x66/0x90
[<ffffffff8172efab>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4b/0x60
[<ffffffff817193c1>] kmemleak_alloc_percpu+0x61/0xe0
[<ffffffff811a26f0>] pcpu_alloc+0x370/0x630
Additional backtrace lines are truncated. In addition, the above splat is
followed by several "BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context
at mm/slub.c:1268" outputs. As suggested by Martin KaFai Lau, these are the
clue to the fix. Routine kmemleak_alloc_percpu() always uses GFP_KERNEL
for its allocations, whereas it should follow the gfp from its callers.
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v3.18+
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
---
V3 Modify kmemleak header for case where kmemleak is not selected
V2 - Remove extraneous file added by mistake as noted by Catalin and Kamalesh
Comment revised and Stable added as suggested by Catalin
Wording changes in commit message suggested by Martin
include/linux/kmemleak.h | 6 ++++--
mm/kmemleak.c | 9 +++++----
mm/percpu.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/include/linux/kmemleak.h b/include/linux/kmemleak.h
index e705467..d0a1f99 100644
--- a/include/linux/kmemleak.h
+++ b/include/linux/kmemleak.h
@@ -28,7 +28,8 @@
extern void kmemleak_init(void) __ref;
extern void kmemleak_alloc(const void *ptr, size_t size, int min_count,
gfp_t gfp) __ref;
-extern void kmemleak_alloc_percpu(const void __percpu *ptr, size_t size) __ref;
+extern void kmemleak_alloc_percpu(const void __percpu *ptr, size_t size,
+ gfp_t gfp) __ref;
extern void kmemleak_free(const void *ptr) __ref;
extern void kmemleak_free_part(const void *ptr, size_t size) __ref;
extern void kmemleak_free_percpu(const void __percpu *ptr) __ref;
@@ -71,7 +72,8 @@ static inline void kmemleak_alloc_recursive(const void *ptr, size_t size,
gfp_t gfp)
{
}
-static inline void kmemleak_alloc_percpu(const void __percpu *ptr, size_t size)
+static inline void kmemleak_alloc_percpu(const void __percpu *ptr, size_t size,
+ gfp_t gfp)
{
}
static inline void kmemleak_free(const void *ptr)
diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
index ca9e5a5..cf79f11 100644
--- a/mm/kmemleak.c
+++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -930,12 +930,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kmemleak_alloc);
* kmemleak_alloc_percpu - register a newly allocated __percpu object
* @ptr: __percpu pointer to beginning of the object
* @size: size of the object
+ * @gfp: flags used for kmemleak internal memory allocations
*
* This function is called from the kernel percpu allocator when a new object
- * (memory block) is allocated (alloc_percpu). It assumes GFP_KERNEL
- * allocation.
+ * (memory block) is allocated (alloc_percpu).
*/
-void __ref kmemleak_alloc_percpu(const void __percpu *ptr, size_t size)
+void __ref kmemleak_alloc_percpu(const void __percpu *ptr, size_t size,
+ gfp_t gfp)
{
unsigned int cpu;
@@ -948,7 +949,7 @@ void __ref kmemleak_alloc_percpu(const void __percpu *ptr, size_t size)
if (kmemleak_enabled && ptr && !IS_ERR(ptr))
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
create_object((unsigned long)per_cpu_ptr(ptr, cpu),
- size, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
+ size, 0, gfp);
else if (kmemleak_early_log)
log_early(KMEMLEAK_ALLOC_PERCPU, ptr, size, 0);
}
diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index dfd0248..2dd7448 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -1030,7 +1030,7 @@ area_found:
memset((void *)pcpu_chunk_addr(chunk, cpu, 0) + off, 0, size);
ptr = __addr_to_pcpu_ptr(chunk->base_addr + off);
- kmemleak_alloc_percpu(ptr, size);
+ kmemleak_alloc_percpu(ptr, size, gfp);
return ptr;
fail_unlock:
--
2.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists