lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1434580149-3095-113-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:28:59 -0700
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Vittorio Gambaletta <linuxbugs@...tgam.net>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13.y-ckt 112/122] ipv4: Avoid crashing in ip_error

3.13.11-ckt22 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>

commit 381c759d9916c42959515ad34a6d467e24a88e93 upstream.

ip_error does not check if in_dev is NULL before dereferencing it.

IThe following sequence of calls is possible:
CPU A                          CPU B
ip_rcv_finish
    ip_route_input_noref()
        ip_route_input_slow()
                               inetdev_destroy()
    dst_input()

With the result that a network device can be destroyed while processing
an input packet.

A crash was triggered with only unicast packets in flight, and
forwarding enabled on the only network device.   The error condition
was created by the removal of the network device.

As such it is likely the that error code was -EHOSTUNREACH, and the
action taken by ip_error (if in_dev had been accessible) would have
been to not increment any counters and to have tried and likely failed
to send an icmp error as the network device is going away.

Therefore handle this weird case by just dropping the packet if
!in_dev.  It will result in dropping the packet sooner, and will not
result in an actual change of behavior.

Fixes: 251da4130115b ("ipv4: Cache ip_error() routes even when not forwarding.")
Reported-by: Vittorio Gambaletta <linuxbugs@...tgam.net>
Tested-by: Vittorio Gambaletta <linuxbugs@...tgam.net>
Signed-off-by: Vittorio Gambaletta <linuxbugs@...tgam.net>
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 net/ipv4/route.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index 01176f0..758a85d 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -917,6 +917,10 @@ static int ip_error(struct sk_buff *skb)
 	bool send;
 	int code;
 
+	/* IP on this device is disabled. */
+	if (!in_dev)
+		goto out;
+
 	net = dev_net(rt->dst.dev);
 	if (!IN_DEV_FORWARD(in_dev)) {
 		switch (rt->dst.error) {
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ