[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1434580149-3095-85-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:28:31 -0700
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@...il.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13.y-ckt 084/122] ext4: check for zero length extent explicitly
3.13.11-ckt22 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@...il.com>
commit 2f974865ffdfe7b9f46a9940836c8b167342563d upstream.
The following commit introduced a bug when checking for zero length extent
5946d08 ext4: check for overlapping extents in ext4_valid_extent_entries()
Zero length extent could pass the check if lblock is zero.
Adding the explicit check for zero length back.
Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index da05fe2..ab642c7 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int ext4_valid_extent(struct inode *inode, struct ext4_extent *ext)
ext4_lblk_t lblock = le32_to_cpu(ext->ee_block);
ext4_lblk_t last = lblock + len - 1;
- if (lblock > last)
+ if (len == 0 || lblock > last)
return 0;
return ext4_data_block_valid(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb), block, len);
}
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists