[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5581061B.8030701@hitachi.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 14:31:07 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
CC: Naohiro Aota <naota@...sp.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, namhyung@...nel.org,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH perf/core v3 3/3] [BUGFIX] perf probe: Show usage even
if the last event is skipped
On 2015/06/16 23:46, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 08:50:57PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu:
>> When the last part of converted events are blacklisted or out-of-text,
>> those are skipped and perf probe doesn't show usage examples.
>> This fixes it to show the example even if the last part of event list
>> is skipped.
>>
>> E.g. without this patch, events are added, but suddenly end;
>
> End what? Stop being added?
"End without the last message", I meant.
> I.e. not all eligible events are added? From
> your description the problem seems to be that that last message: "You
> can now use it..." is not presented, but here, without this patch, it
> is:
I see, actually, this happens only if the skipped symbols (
vfs_caches_init_early or vfs_caches_init) are placed at the end of the
matched symbol list. On Ubuntu 15.04 kernel, it doesn't have
vfs_load_quota_inode etc. and the vfs_caches_init is the last part of
the matched list. Since it is hard to reproduce, I've added a Note on
the end of description :)
----
>>
>> Note that this can be reproduced ONLY IF the vfs_caches_init*
>> is the last part of matched symbol list. I've checked this happens
>> on "3.19.0-generic #18-Ubuntu" kernel binary.
>>
----
To reproduce this bug, you need to find a good symbol matching pattern
which (1) matches both of valid function in .text and invalid function
in .inittext (2) invalid one must be on the end of matched function list.
I fortunately hit such pattern and found this bug, but it depends on
the kernel binary.
[...]
> I.e. the only problem I found was this:
>
> [root@zoo ~]# time perf probe -l > /dev/null
>
> real 0m15.408s
> user 0m14.892s
> sys 0m0.534s
> [root@zoo ~]#
> [root@zoo ~]# perf stat perf probe -l > /dev/null
>
> Performance counter stats for 'perf probe -l':
>
> 15256.588897 task-clock (msec) # 1.001 CPUs utilized
> 116 context-switches # 0.008 K/sec
> 4 cpu-migrations # 0.000 K/sec
> 230,720 page-faults # 0.015 M/sec
> 47,830,405,530 cycles # 3.135 GHz
> 43,974,134,505 stalled-cycles-frontend # 91.94% frontend cycles idle
> <not supported> stalled-cycles-backend
> 11,540,587,038 instructions # 0.24 insns per cycle
> # 3.81 stalled cycles per insn
> 2,807,769,592 branches # 184.037 M/sec
> 20,087,075 branch-misses # 0.72% of all branches
>
> 15.240796324 seconds time elapsed
>
> [root@zoo ~]#
>
> Can you check why it takes so long and check the need for this patch?
It is because perf probe -l is not optimized to show a lot of probes yet.
It initializes and loads debuginfo for each probe. I guess we can reuse
debuginfo among them. let me try...
Thank you,
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Linux Technology Research Center, System Productivity Research Dept.
Center for Technology Innovation - Systems Engineering
Hitachi, Ltd., Research & Development Group
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists