linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] mm: mirrored memory support for page buddy allocations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 2015 07:58:08 +0200
From:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:	Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, nao.horiguchi@...il.com,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...e.hu,
	Xiexiuqi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] mm: mirrored memory support for page buddy
 allocations

On 18.6.2015 3:23, Xishi Qiu wrote:
> On 2015/6/16 17:46, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> 
>> On 06/16/2015 10:17 AM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>>> On 2015/6/16 15:53, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 06/04/2015 02:54 PM, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I think add a new migratetype is btter and easier than a new zone, so I use
>>>>
>>>> If the mirrored memory is in a single reasonably compact (no large holes) range
>>>> (per NUMA node) and won't dynamically change its size, then zone might be a
>>>> better option. For one thing, it will still allow distinguishing movable and
>>>> unmovable allocations within the mirrored memory.
>>>>
>>>> We had enough fun with MIGRATE_CMA and all kinds of checks it added to allocator
>>>> hot paths, and even CMA is now considering moving to a separate zone.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi, how about the problem of this case:
>>> e.g. node 0: 0-4G(dma and dma32)
>>>      node 1: 4G-8G(normal), 8-12G(mirror), 12-16G(normal),
>>> so more than one normal zone in a node? or normal zone just span the mirror zone?
>>
>> Normal zone can span the mirror zone just fine. However, it will result in zone
>> scanners such as compaction to skip over the mirror zone inefficiently. Hmm...

On the other hand, it would skip just as inefficiently over MIGRATE_MIRROR
pageblocks within a Normal zone. Since migrating pages between MIGRATE_MIRROR
and other types pageblocks would violate what the allocations requested.

Having separate zone instead would allow compaction to run specifically on the
zone and defragment movable allocations there (i.e. userspace pages if/when
userspace requesting mirrored memory is supported).

>>
> 
> Hi Vlastimil,
> 
> If there are many mirror regions in one node, then it will be many holes in the
> normal zone, is this fine?

Yeah, it doesn't matter how many holes there are.

> Thanks,
> Xishi Qiu
> 
>>
>> .
>>
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/