[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1434611556.2385.8.camel@x220>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 09:12:36 +0200
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mturquette@...libre.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: add generated clock driver
On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 15:23 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig
> +config HAVE_AT91_GENERATED
> + bool
This will always be 'n'.
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/Makefile
> +obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_AT91_GENERATED) += clk-generated.o
And clk-generated.o will never be built.
I think your options are to use
config HAVE_AT91_GENERATED
def_bool y
or
config HAVE_AT91_GENERATED
bool "Yadda yadda yadda"
or add
select HAVE_AT91_GENERATED
somewhere (possibly even in a second patch). But as it stands the patch
looks like an elaborate NOP.
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists