| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 01:16:03 -0700
From: tip-bot for Wang Nan <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de, acme@...hat.com,
wangnan0@...wei.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
mingo@...hat.com, mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hpa@...or.com, jolsa@...nel.org, lizefan@...wei.com,
namhyung@...nel.org
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf tools:
Fix a problem when opening old perf.data with different byte order
Commit-ID: b30b617292462ca7ee68834b117a7833f4a52e16
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/b30b617292462ca7ee68834b117a7833f4a52e16
Author: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 09:56:39 +0000
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CommitDate: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 16:28:08 -0300
perf tools: Fix a problem when opening old perf.data with different byte order
Following error occurs when trying to use 'perf report' on x86_64 to
cross analysis a perf.data generated by an old perf on a big-endian
machine:
# perf report
*** Error in `/home/w00229757/perf': free(): invalid next size (fast): 0x00000000032c99f0 ***
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x6eeef)[0x7ff6ff7e2eef]
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x78cae)[0x7ff6ff7eccae]
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x79987)[0x7ff6ff7ed987]
/path/to/perf[0x4ac734]
/path/to/perf[0x4ac829]
/path/to/perf(perf_header__process_sections+0x129)[0x4ad2c9]
/path/to/perf(perf_session__read_header+0x2e1)[0x4ad9e1]
/path/to/perf(perf_session__new+0x168)[0x4bd458]
/path/to/perf(cmd_report+0xfa0)[0x43eb70]
/path/to/perf[0x47adc3]
/path/to/perf(main+0x5f6)[0x42fd06]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5)[0x7ff6ff795bd5]
/path/to/perf[0x42fe35]
======= Memory map: ========
[SNIP]
The bug is in perf_event__attr_swap(). It swaps all fields in 'struct
perf_event_attr' without checking whether the swapped field exist or
not. In addition, in read_event_desc() allocs memory for attr according
to size read from perf.data.
Therefore, if the perf.data is collected by an old perf (without
aux_watermark, for example), when perf_event__attr_swap() swaping
attr->aux_watermark it destroy malloc's metadata.
This patch introduces boundary checking in perf_event__attr_swap(). It
adds macros bswap_field_64 and bswap_field_32 into
perf_event__attr_swap() to make it only swap exist fields.
Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
Cc: pi3orama@....com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1434534999-85347-1-git-send-email-wangnan0@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
tools/perf/util/session.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
index f31e024..e1cd17c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
@@ -517,20 +517,42 @@ void perf_event__attr_swap(struct perf_event_attr *attr)
{
attr->type = bswap_32(attr->type);
attr->size = bswap_32(attr->size);
- attr->config = bswap_64(attr->config);
- attr->sample_period = bswap_64(attr->sample_period);
- attr->sample_type = bswap_64(attr->sample_type);
- attr->read_format = bswap_64(attr->read_format);
- attr->wakeup_events = bswap_32(attr->wakeup_events);
- attr->bp_type = bswap_32(attr->bp_type);
- attr->bp_addr = bswap_64(attr->bp_addr);
- attr->bp_len = bswap_64(attr->bp_len);
- attr->branch_sample_type = bswap_64(attr->branch_sample_type);
- attr->sample_regs_user = bswap_64(attr->sample_regs_user);
- attr->sample_stack_user = bswap_32(attr->sample_stack_user);
- attr->aux_watermark = bswap_32(attr->aux_watermark);
-
- swap_bitfield((u8 *) (&attr->read_format + 1), sizeof(u64));
+
+#define bswap_safe(f, n) \
+ (attr->size > (offsetof(struct perf_event_attr, f) + \
+ sizeof(attr->f) * (n)))
+#define bswap_field(f, sz) \
+do { \
+ if (bswap_safe(f, 0)) \
+ attr->f = bswap_##sz(attr->f); \
+} while(0)
+#define bswap_field_32(f) bswap_field(f, 32)
+#define bswap_field_64(f) bswap_field(f, 64)
+
+ bswap_field_64(config);
+ bswap_field_64(sample_period);
+ bswap_field_64(sample_type);
+ bswap_field_64(read_format);
+ bswap_field_32(wakeup_events);
+ bswap_field_32(bp_type);
+ bswap_field_64(bp_addr);
+ bswap_field_64(bp_len);
+ bswap_field_64(branch_sample_type);
+ bswap_field_64(sample_regs_user);
+ bswap_field_32(sample_stack_user);
+ bswap_field_32(aux_watermark);
+
+ /*
+ * After read_format are bitfields. Check read_format because
+ * we are unable to use offsetof on bitfield.
+ */
+ if (bswap_safe(read_format, 1))
+ swap_bitfield((u8 *) (&attr->read_format + 1),
+ sizeof(u64));
+#undef bswap_field_64
+#undef bswap_field_32
+#undef bswap_field
+#undef bswap_safe
}
static void perf_event__hdr_attr_swap(union perf_event *event,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists