[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150618093315.GB1094@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:33:15 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86/asm/entry/32: Simplify ptrace register shuffling
* Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> wrote:
> Before this patch, we were clearing pt_regs->r8..r11 on stack.
> We can as well just store actual r8..r11 registers there:
> they came from userspace, we leak no information by showing them to ptrace.
> This allows to get rid of one insn ("xor %eax,%eax").
> Not a big deal, but still...
>
> After call to syscall_trace_enter(), before this patch we were restoring
> clobbered registers and jump to code which converts 32-bit syscall
> ABI to 64-bit C ABI. This is unnecessary work, we can combine both
> steps into one (similar to what audit code does already).
So this really needs a description about what kind of testing was done, as
technically this changes the ABI. Heavy ptrace users should be tried: strace,
UML, etc.
I don't expect any problems, but still it needs to be tested.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists