[an error occurred while processing this directive]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

[an error occurred while processing this directive]

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1434621447-21175-2-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 2015 11:57:26 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] oom: Do not panic when OOM killer is sysrq triggered

OOM killer might be triggered externally via sysrq+f. This is supposed
to kill a task no matter what e.g. a task is selected even though there
is an OOM victim on the way to exit. This is a big hammer for an admin
to help to resolve a memory short condition when the system is not able
to cope with it on its own in a reasonable time frame (e.g. when the
system is trashing or the OOM killer cannot make sufficient progress)

E.g. it doesn't make any sense to obey panic_on_oom setting because
a) administrator could have used other sysrqs to achieve the
panic/reboot and b) the policy would break an existing usecase to
kill a memory hog which would be recoverable unlike the panic which
might be configured for the real OOM condition.

It also doesn't make much sense to panic the system when there is no
OOM killable task because administrator might choose to do additional
steps before rebooting/panicing the system.

While we are there also add a comment explaining why
sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task doesn't apply to sysrq triggered OOM
killer even though there is no explicit check and we subtly rely
on current->mm being NULL for the context from which it is triggered.

Also be more explicit about sysrq+f behavior in the documentation.

Requested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
---
 Documentation/sysrq.txt |  5 ++++-
 mm/oom_kill.c           | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/sysrq.txt b/Documentation/sysrq.txt
index 0e307c94809a..a5dd88b0aede 100644
--- a/Documentation/sysrq.txt
+++ b/Documentation/sysrq.txt
@@ -75,7 +75,10 @@ On other - If you know of the key combos for other architectures, please
 
 'e'     - Send a SIGTERM to all processes, except for init.
 
-'f'	- Will call oom_kill to kill a memory hog process.
+'f'	- Will call oom_kill to kill a memory hog process. Please note that
+	  an ongoing OOM killer is ignored and a task is killed even though
+	  there was an oom victim selected already. panic_on_oom is ignored
+	  and the system doesn't panic if there are no oom killable tasks.
 
 'g'	- Used by kgdb (kernel debugger)
 
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index dff991e0681e..0c312eaac834 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -687,8 +687,14 @@ bool out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	constraint = constrained_alloc(zonelist, gfp_mask, nodemask,
 						&totalpages);
 	mpol_mask = (constraint == CONSTRAINT_MEMORY_POLICY) ? nodemask : NULL;
-	check_panic_on_oom(constraint, gfp_mask, order, mpol_mask, NULL);
+	/* Ignore panic_on_oom when the OOM killer is sysrq triggered */
+	if (!force_kill)
+		check_panic_on_oom(constraint, gfp_mask, order, mpol_mask, NULL);
 
+	/*
+	 * not affecting force_kill because sysrq triggered OOM killer runs from
+	 * the workqueue context so current->mm will be NULL
+	 */
 	if (sysctl_oom_kill_allocating_task && current->mm &&
 	    !oom_unkillable_task(current, NULL, nodemask) &&
 	    current->signal->oom_score_adj != OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN) {
@@ -700,10 +706,17 @@ bool out_of_memory(struct zonelist *zonelist, gfp_t gfp_mask,
 	}
 
 	p = select_bad_process(&points, totalpages, mpol_mask, force_kill);
-	/* Found nothing?!?! Either we hang forever, or we panic. */
+	/*
+	 * Found nothing?!?! Either we hang forever, or we panic.
+	 * Do not panic when the OOM killer is sysrq triggered.
+	 */
 	if (!p) {
-		dump_header(NULL, gfp_mask, order, NULL, mpol_mask);
-		panic("Out of memory and no killable processes...\n");
+		if (!force_kill) {
+			dump_header(NULL, gfp_mask, order, NULL, mpol_mask);
+			panic("Out of memory and no killable processes...\n");
+		} else {
+			pr_info("Forced out of memory. No killable task found...\n");
+		}
 	}
 	if (p != (void *)-1UL) {
 		oom_kill_process(p, gfp_mask, order, points, totalpages, NULL,
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/