[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5582A374.6020402@de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:54:44 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] tun, macvtap: higher order allocations for skbs
Am 18.06.2015 um 12:20 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> Needs more testing. Anyone see anything wrong with this?
Can you explain the motivation?
FWIW, basic networking between two guest over macvtap still
seems to work on s390 so I dont see any obvious regression.
Christian
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/macvtap.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/tun.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/macvtap.c b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> index 928f3f4..80e87e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
> @@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ static inline struct sk_buff *macvtap_alloc_skb(struct sock *sk, size_t prepad,
> linear = len;
>
> skb = sock_alloc_send_pskb(sk, prepad + linear, len - linear, noblock,
> - err, 0);
> + err, 1);
> if (!skb)
> return NULL;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index cb376b2d..8f2f1e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -1069,7 +1069,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *tun_alloc_skb(struct tun_file *tfile,
> linear = len;
>
> skb = sock_alloc_send_pskb(sk, prepad + linear, len - linear, noblock,
> - &err, 0);
> + &err, 1);
> if (!skb)
> return ERR_PTR(err);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists