linux-kernel - Re: [Resend PATCH v8 0/4] sched: Rewrite runnable load and utilization average tracking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP705160B9773DDA6109B09F80A50@phx.gbl>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 2015 19:48:00 +0800
From:	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
To:	Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
CC:	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, mingo@...nel.org,
	peterz@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pjt@...gle.com,
	bsegall@...gle.com, morten.rasmussen@....com,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
	len.brown@...el.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
	fengguang.wu@...el.com, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Resend PATCH v8 0/4] sched: Rewrite runnable load and
 utilization average tracking



On 6/18/15 6:46 AM, Yuyang Du wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 02:31:00PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> On 6/17/15 11:11 AM, Yuyang Du wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The sched_debug is informative, lets first give it some analysis.
>>>
>>> The workload is 12 CPU hogging tasks (always runnable) and 1 dbench
>>> task doing fs ops (70% runnable) running at the same time.
>>>
>>> Actually, these 13 tasks are in a task group /autogroup-9617, which
>>> has weight 1024.
>>>
>>> So the 13 tasks at most can contribute to an average of 79 (=1024/13)
>>> to the group entity's load_avg:
>>>
>>> cfs_rq[0]:/autogroup-9617
>>> .se->load.weight               : 2
>>> .se->avg.load_avg              : 0
>>>
>>> cfs_rq[1]:/autogroup-9617
>>> .se->load.weight               : 80
>>> .se->avg.load_avg              : 79
>>>
>>> cfs_rq[2]:/autogroup-9617
>>> .se->load.weight               : 79
>>> .se->avg.load_avg              : 78
>>>
>>> cfs_rq[3]:/autogroup-9617
>>> .se->load.weight               : 80
>>> .se->avg.load_avg              : 81
>>>
>>> cfs_rq[4]:/autogroup-9617
>>> .se->load.weight               : 80
>>> .se->avg.load_avg              : 79
>>>
>>> cfs_rq[5]:/autogroup-9617
>>> .se->load.weight               : 79
>>> .se->avg.load_avg              : 77
>>>
>>> cfs_rq[6]:/autogroup-9617
>>> .se->load.weight               : 159
>>> .se->avg.load_avg              : 156
>>>
>>> cfs_rq[7]:/autogroup-9617
>>> .se->load.weight               : 64  (dbench)
>>> .se->avg.load_avg              : 50
>> How you figure out this one is dbench?
>>
> dbench is on CPU7 and running there?

Sorry, do you mean you pin dbench to CPU7?

Regards,
Wanpeng Li

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/