lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5582B51C.8070700@stratus.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 2015 08:10:04 -0400
From:	Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...atus.com>
To:	Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.reddy@...gotech.com>, <jejb@...nel.org>,
	<hch@...radead.org>, <jthumshirn@...e.de>
CC:	<martin.petersen@...cle.com>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	<JBottomley@...allels.com>, <Sathya.Prakash@...gotech.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/20 v1] [SCSI] mpt3sas: Use alloc_ordered_workqueue()
 API instead of create_singlethread_workqueue() API

On 06/16/2015 01:37 AM, Sreekanth Reddy wrote:
> Created a thread using alloc_ordered_workqueue() API in order to process
> the works from firmware Work-queue sequentially instead of
> create_singlethread_workqueue() API.
> 
> Changes in v1:
>     No need to check for backport compatibility in the upstream kernel.
> so removing the else section where driver use 
> create_singlethread_workqueue() API if alloc_ordered_workqueue() API is
> not defined, This else section is not required since in the latest upstream
> kernel this alloc_ordered_workqueue() API is always defined.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sreekanth Reddy <Sreekanth.Reddy@...gotech.com>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
> index b848458..7e5926c 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/mpt3sas_scsih.c
> @@ -8085,8 +8085,8 @@ _scsih_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
>  	/* event thread */
>  	snprintf(ioc->firmware_event_name, sizeof(ioc->firmware_event_name),
>  	    "fw_event%d", ioc->id);
> -	ioc->firmware_event_thread = create_singlethread_workqueue(
> -	    ioc->firmware_event_name);
> +	ioc->firmware_event_thread = alloc_ordered_workqueue(
> +	    ioc->firmware_event_name, WQ_MEM_RECLAIM);
>  	if (!ioc->firmware_event_thread) {
>  		pr_err(MPT3SAS_FMT "failure at %s:%d/%s()!\n",
>  		    ioc->name, __FILE__, __LINE__, __func__);
> 

Hi Sreekanth,

Is this change still needed after e09c2c2954684 workqueue: apply
__WQ_ORDERED to create_singlethread_workqueue() ?  (3.17+)

In upstream, this change looks cosmetic (unless Tejun has a preference
for one over the other), but maybe converting to alloc_ordered_workqueue
keeps your in house version in closer sync?

Thanks,

-- Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ