[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5582C055.6040908@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:57:57 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
CC: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com, mporter@...sulko.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/11] nvmem: Add nvmem_device based consumer apis.
On 16/06/15 23:49, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 05/21/2015 09:43 AM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
>> index 8a4b358..68ee8d1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
>> @@ -436,6 +436,51 @@ static int __nvmem_device_put(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static int nvmem_match(struct device *dev, const void *data)
>> +{
>> + return !strcmp(dev_name(dev), (const char *)data);
>
> Unnecessary cast.
Sure, will fix it.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct nvmem_device *nvmem_find(const char *name)
>> +{
>> + struct device *d;
>> +
>> + d = class_find_device(&nvmem_class, NULL, (void *)name, nvmem_match);
>
> Unnecessary cast
Will fix it.
>
>> +
>> + return d ? to_nvmem_device(d) : NULL;
>> +}
>
> [...]
>> +
>> +void nvmem_device_put(struct nvmem_device *nvmem)
>> +{
>> + __nvmem_device_put(nvmem);
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_device_put);
>>
>> +int nvmem_device_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
>> + struct nvmem_cell_info *info, void *buf)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_device_cell_read);
>> +
>> +int nvmem_device_cell_write(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
>> + struct nvmem_cell_info *info, void *buf)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_device_cell_write);
>> +
>> +int nvmem_device_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
>> + unsigned int offset,
>> + size_t bytes, void *buf)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_device_read);
>> +
>> +int nvmem_device_write(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
>> + unsigned int offset,
>> + size_t bytes, void *buf)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvmem_device_write);
>
> Can you please add kernel-doc on these exported APIs?
>
Thanks for spotting, I will add them.
>> +
>> static int nvmem_init(void)
>> {
>> return class_register(&nvmem_class);
>> diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h b/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h
>> index c3fa8c7..66c67ba 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/nvmem-consumer.h
>> @@ -23,6 +32,18 @@ void nvmem_cell_put(struct nvmem_cell *cell);
>> void *nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_cell *cell, ssize_t *len);
>> int nvmem_cell_write(struct nvmem_cell *cell, void *buf, ssize_t len);
>>
>> +/* direct nvmem device read/write interface */
>> +struct nvmem_device *nvmem_device_get(struct device *dev, const char *name);
>> +void nvmem_device_put(struct nvmem_device *nvmem);
>> +int nvmem_device_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, unsigned int offset,
>> + size_t bytes, void *buf);
>> +int nvmem_device_write(struct nvmem_device *nvmem, unsigned int offset,
>> + size_t bytes, void *buf);
>> +int nvmem_device_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
>> + struct nvmem_cell_info *info, void *buf);
>> +int nvmem_device_cell_write(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
>> + struct nvmem_cell_info *info, void *buf);
>> +
>
> Can we also have devm_nvmem_*_get() APIs please?
Sure, I will spin it in next version.
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
>> index 4908b37..7a982cd 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/nvmem-provider.h
>> @@ -12,15 +12,9 @@
>> #ifndef _LINUX_NVMEM_PROVIDER_H
>> #define _LINUX_NVMEM_PROVIDER_H
>>
>> -struct nvmem_device;
>> +#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
>>
>> -struct nvmem_cell_info {
>> - const char *name;
>> - int offset;
>> - int bytes;
>> - int bit_offset;
>> - int nbits;
>> -};
>> +struct nvmem_device;
>
> Should this diff be part of an earlier patch?
Possibly, something wrong with this diff, I will fix it.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists