[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18137.1434641209@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:26:49 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, eparis@...hat.com,
linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
drquigl <drquigl@...ho.nsa.gov>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] SELinux: Handle opening of a unioned file
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov> wrote:
> Almost want to be able to compute a transition label for the ecryptfs
> inodes from the lower inode label so that it can be derived from but
> potentially different from the lower inode label. That way policy could
> maintain per-file distinctions within an ecryptfs mount and distinguish
> between access to the encrypted vs plaintext representations.
Yeah. What we want is something like:
lower-inode-label + proposed-upper-label + subject-label -> inode-label
By proposed-upper-label I mean the default label for a new inode at that the
point in the directory tree at which the copy up will take place.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists