[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5582FEF4.3090708@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:25:08 -0500
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: define of_find_node_by_phandle for !CONFIG_OF
On 06/17/2015 06:33 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com> wrote:
>> Define stub implementation for of_find_node_by_phandle() API
>> so that users of this API can build properly even when CONFIG_OF
>> is not defined.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
>
> Do you have a user for this? If not, apply it when you do.
Yeah, ran into a randconfig build problem on x86 when we tried to add an
API to remoteproc core [1] that used this function.
regards
Suman
[1] http://marc.info/?l=devicetree&m=143232772426559&w=2
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
>
>> ---
>> include/linux/of.h | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
>> index ddeaae6d2083..90dfdc47ae26 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/of.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
>> @@ -422,6 +422,11 @@ static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_opts_by_path(const char *path,
>> return NULL;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle handle)
>> +{
>> + return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> static inline struct device_node *of_get_parent(const struct device_node *node)
>> {
>> return NULL;
>> --
>> 2.4.1
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists