linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: fix search limit handling in skb_find

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150618200131.GA3506@salvia>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 2015 22:01:31 +0200
From:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:	Roman Khimov <khimov@...ell.ru>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, kaber@...sh.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Phil Oester <kernel@...uxace.com>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fix search limit handling in skb_find_text()

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 03:13:41PM +0300, Roman Khimov wrote:
> В письме от 16 июня 2015 12:48:41 пользователь Pablo Neira Ayuso написал:
[...]
> > But if we change the existing behaviour, users may be relying on it
> > and we'll get things broken for them. Someone else will come later one
> > with another patch to say: "hey, --to used to be inclusive but this is
> > not the case anymore and it's breaking my setup".
> 
> I do understand your concerns, but fixing it this way would require changing 
> skb_seq_read() and basicaly would propagate "'to' offset included" semantics 
> (which seems a bit strange for programmers, IMO) further. And initially I 
> thought that changing skb_seq_read() would be more intrusive, although looking 
> at all this now it looks like the only real user of upper_offset field in 
> ts_config struct is skb_find_text(), because other invocations of 
> skb_seq_read() from drivers/scsi/libiscsi_tcp.c and net/batman-adv/main.c use 
> skb->len as an upper limit.
> 
> > > em_text_match() in net/sched/em_text.c is also suspicious.
> > 
> > Please, elaborate.
> 
> The way it constructs 'to' offset, I think it doesn't expect something to 
> match at 'to'. Although I might be wrong here.

Could you send a patch that resolves the inconsistency for programmers
while leaving the userspace exposed behaviour through xt_string and
em_string intact? Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/