[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5583234E.5080807@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 13:00:14 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Kanaka Juvva <kanaka.d.juvva@...ux.intel.com>
CC: kanaka.d.juvva@...el.com, glenn.p.williamson@...el.com,
matt.fleming@...el.com, will.auld@...el.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
ananth.s.narayan@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
andrew.j.herdrich@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
peterz@...radead.org, x86@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, luto@...capital.net, dvlasenk@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, imammedo@...hat.com,
bp@...e.de, ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com, jacob.w.shin@...il.com,
dirk.j.brandewie@...el.com, vikas.shivappa@...el.com,
edwin.verplanke@...el.com, tomasz.kantecki@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] x86, perf,cqm: handle CPU hotplug
On 06/18/2015 12:47 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > @@ -1239,12 +1239,15 @@ static inline void cqm_pick_event_reader(int cpu)
>> > int phys_id = topology_physical_package_id(cpu);
>> > int i;
>> >
>> > + mutex_lock(&cache_mutex);
> I already explained it to Vikas. You CANNOT take a mutex in that code
> path as it runs with interrupts disabled on a CPU which cannot
> schedule.
How did lockdep not blow up and scream about this?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists