| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:01:28 -0700
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: [tip:sched/hrtimers] sched,rt:
Remove return value from pull_rt_task()
Commit-ID: 8046d6806247088de5725eaf8a2580b29e50ac5a
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/8046d6806247088de5725eaf8a2580b29e50ac5a
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 14:46:40 +0200
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:25:26 +0200
sched,rt: Remove return value from pull_rt_task()
In order to be able to use pull_rt_task() from a callback, we need to
do away with the return value.
Since the return value indicates if we should reschedule, do this
inside the function. Since not all callers currently do this, this can
increase the number of reschedules due rt balancing.
Too many reschedules is not a correctness issues, too few are.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: ktkhai@...allels.com
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: juri.lelli@...il.com
Cc: pang.xunlei@...aro.org
Cc: oleg@...hat.com
Cc: wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com
Cc: umgwanakikbuti@...il.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150611124742.679002000@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/sched/rt.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 4f3726f..c702b48 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ int alloc_rt_sched_group(struct task_group *tg, struct task_group *parent)
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq);
+static void pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq);
static inline bool need_pull_rt_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
{
@@ -415,9 +415,8 @@ static inline bool need_pull_rt_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
return false;
}
-static inline int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
+static inline void pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
{
- return 0;
}
static inline void queue_push_tasks(struct rq *rq)
@@ -1955,14 +1954,15 @@ static void push_irq_work_func(struct irq_work *work)
}
#endif /* HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI */
-static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
+static void pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
{
- int this_cpu = this_rq->cpu, ret = 0, cpu;
+ int this_cpu = this_rq->cpu, cpu;
+ bool resched = false;
struct task_struct *p;
struct rq *src_rq;
if (likely(!rt_overloaded(this_rq)))
- return 0;
+ return;
/*
* Match the barrier from rt_set_overloaded; this guarantees that if we
@@ -1973,7 +1973,7 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
#ifdef HAVE_RT_PUSH_IPI
if (sched_feat(RT_PUSH_IPI)) {
tell_cpu_to_push(this_rq);
- return 0;
+ return;
}
#endif
@@ -2026,7 +2026,7 @@ static int pull_rt_task(struct rq *this_rq)
if (p->prio < src_rq->curr->prio)
goto skip;
- ret = 1;
+ resched = true;
deactivate_task(src_rq, p, 0);
set_task_cpu(p, this_cpu);
@@ -2042,7 +2042,8 @@ skip:
double_unlock_balance(this_rq, src_rq);
}
- return ret;
+ if (resched)
+ resched_curr(this_rq);
}
/*
@@ -2138,8 +2139,7 @@ static void switched_from_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
if (!task_on_rq_queued(p) || rq->rt.rt_nr_running)
return;
- if (pull_rt_task(rq))
- resched_curr(rq);
+ pull_rt_task(rq);
}
void __init init_sched_rt_class(void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists