[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5583D85F.7090200@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:52:47 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, andrey@...l.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] vhost: support upto 509 memory regions
On 19/06/2015 10:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > No, only destruction of the memory region frees it. address_space_map
> > takes a reference to the memory region and address_space_unmap releases it.
> >
> > Paolo
>
> Confused. So can we call mmap(MAP_NORESERVE) in address_space_unmap
> after we detect refcount is 0?
No, because in the meanwhile another DIMM could have been hotplugged
at the same place where the old one was. This is legal:
user guest QEMU
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
start I/O
'---------------> address_space_map
device_del
'-------------------> receives SCI
executes _EJ0
'---------------> memory_region_del_subregion
object_unparent
device_add
'-----------------------------------------> device_set_realized
hotplug_handler_plug
pc_machine_device_plug_cb
pc_dimm_plug
memory_region_add_subregion
I/O finishes
address_space_unmap
Surprise removal similarly could be done in QEMU, but it will hold to
some resources for as long as the device backends need them.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists