linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] vhost: support upto 509 memory regions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55843310.50403@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Jun 2015 17:19:44 +0200
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC:	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, andrey@...l.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] vhost: support upto 509 memory regions



On 19/06/2015 15:34, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:44:26PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 19/06/2015 12:14, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:52:47AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 19/06/2015 10:05, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>>>>> No, only destruction of the memory region frees it.  address_space_map
>>>>>> takes a reference to the memory region and address_space_unmap releases it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paolo
>>>>>
>>>>> Confused. So can we call mmap(MAP_NORESERVE) in address_space_unmap
>>>>> after we detect refcount is 0?
>>>>
>>>> No, because in the meanwhile another DIMM could have been hotplugged
>>>> at the same place where the old one was.  This is legal:
>>>>
>>>>     user                      guest                 QEMU
>>>>     ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>                               start I/O
>>>>                                   '---------------> address_space_map
>>>>     device_del
>>>>         '-------------------> receives SCI
>>>>                               executes _EJ0
>>>>                                   '---------------> memory_region_del_subregion
>>>>                                                     object_unparent
>>>
>>> So guest started DMA into memory, then ejected this memory while DMA
>>> is in progress?
>>
>> Yes.  There is nothing that forbids doing that.
> 
> Can we simply defer the next device_add using a hva until all IO completes?

We could, but I/O is just an example.  It can be I/O, a network ring,
whatever.  We cannot audit all address_space_map uses.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/