lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2015 01:23:52 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> Subject: Re: [-next] !irqd_can_balance() WARNINGs at irq_move_masked_irq() On (06/19/15 18:15), Thomas Gleixner wrote: [..] > > > Hi Thomas, > > > Maybe it's caused by the hpet driver itself? > > > irq_set_affinity() may set the IRQD_SETAFFINITY_PENDING flag, > > > thus triggering the warning. > > And the usage pattern seems reasonable, the IRQF_NOBALANCING flag > > means nobody may change the affinity except myself:) > > Right, that's why I removed the restriction. > > I just wonder why we have not seen that before ... just a note, I compile/run every linux-next on at least two different x86-64 boxen, w/o changing the .config a lot. -ss -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists