[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150619183226-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 18:33:39 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, andrey@...l.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] vhost: support upto 509 memory regions
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 06:26:27PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 19/06/2015 18:20, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > We could, but I/O is just an example. It can be I/O, a network ring,
> > > whatever. We cannot audit all address_space_map uses.
> > >
> >
> > No need to audit them all: defer device_add using an hva range until
> > address_space_unmap drops using hvas in range drops reference count to
> > 0.
>
> That could be forever. You certainly don't want to lockup the monitor
> forever just because a device model isn't too friendly to memory hot-unplug.
We can defer the addition, no need to lockup the monitor.
> That's why you need to audit them (also, it's perfectly in the device
> model's right to use address_space_unmap this way: it's the guest that's
> buggy and leaves a dangling reference to a region before unplugging it).
>
> Paolo
Then maybe it's not too bad that the guest will crash because the memory
was unmapped.
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists