linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Rename various 'IA32' uses in arch/x86/ code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CBABD26C-3354-4FEE-A24F-01499F5F0C29@zytor.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:19:52 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC:	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Rename various 'IA32' uses in arch/x86/ code

x86-32 is clumsy though.  "Original name that stuck" is perfectly legitimate, and having multiple names for the same thing is always worse then having slightly imperfect names.

On June 19, 2015 12:13:05 AM PDT, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
>> We have generally used i386 as opposed to x86 for that purpose. [...]
>
>So 'i386' is really the original name that stuck.
>
>'x86-32' sounds more appropriate to me - we should not perpetuate the
>i386 name, 
>as we don't run on an original i386 anymore ;-)
>
>Here's what I think sounds pretty natural:
>
>  CONFIG_X86_32_ABI
>  CONFIG_X86_64_ABI
>  CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI
>
>- CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI and CONFIG_X86_32_ABI selects CONFIG_COMPAT.
>- CONFIG_X86_32_ABI enables the 32-bit/32-bit system call ABI.
>- CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI enables the extra 64-bit/32-bit system call
>entries.
>- CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION goes away.
>
>> [...] IA32 in MSR names is part of the MSR name and should not be
>taken out.
>
>Yes, of course.
>
>Thanks,
>
>	Ingo

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone.  Please pardon brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/