[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7ha8vvtrx3.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:32:56 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tyler Baker <tyler.baker@...aro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] futex: lower the lock contention on the HB lock during wake up
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> writes:
> On Fri, 19 Jun 2015, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 1:33 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
>> A handful of boot test failures on ARM/OMAP were found by kernelci.org
>> in next-20150619[1] and were bisected down to this patch, which hit
>> next-20150619 in the form of commit 881bd58d6e9e (futex: Lower the
>> lock contention on the HB lock during wake up). I confirmed that
>> reverting that patch on top of next-20150619 gets things booting again
>> for the affected platforms.
>>
>> I haven't debugged this any further, but full boot logs are available
>> for the boot failures[2][3] and the linux-omap list and maintainer are
>> Cc'd here to help investigate further if needed.
>
> Found it. Dunno, how I missed that one. Fix below.
>
Yup, that fix on top of next-20150619 gets the two OMAP platforms
booting again.
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists