[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150619203601.161417882@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 13:36:29 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.0 099/105] Btrfs: send, add missing check for dead clone root
4.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
commit 5cc2b17e80cf5770f2e585c2d90fd8af1b901258 upstream.
After we locked the root's root item, a concurrent snapshot deletion
call might have set the dead flag on it. So check if the dead flag
is set and abort if it is, just like we do for the parent root.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/send.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/send.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c
@@ -5855,7 +5855,8 @@ long btrfs_ioctl_send(struct file *mnt_f
clone_sources_to_rollback = i + 1;
spin_lock(&clone_root->root_item_lock);
clone_root->send_in_progress++;
- if (!btrfs_root_readonly(clone_root)) {
+ if (!btrfs_root_readonly(clone_root) ||
+ btrfs_root_dead(clone_root)) {
spin_unlock(&clone_root->root_item_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&fs_info->subvol_srcu, index);
ret = -EPERM;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists