[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1434750245-6304-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 15:44:02 -0600
From: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: travis@....com, roland@...estorage.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] mm, x86: Fix ioremap RAM check interfaces
ioremap() checks if a target range is RAM and fails the request
if true. There are multiple issues in the iormap RAM check
interfaces.
1. region_is_ram() does not work at all.
2. The RAM checks, region_is_ram() and __ioremap_caller() via
walk_system_ram_range(), are redundant.
3. walk_system_ram_range() requires the RAM ranges page-aligned
in the resource table. This restriction has allowed multiple
ioremap calls to setup_data, which is not page-aligned.
This patchset solves issue 1 and 2. Issue 3 is not addressed in
this patchset, but is taken into the account that ioremap continues
to allow such callers until it is addressed.
---
Toshi Kani (3):
1/3 mm, x86: Fix warning in ioremap RAM check
2/3 mm, x86: Remove region_is_ram() call from ioremap
3/3 mm: Fix bugs in region_is_ram()
---
arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c | 23 ++++++-----------------
kernel/resource.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists