linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/13] driver-core: defer all probes until late

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1585940.7Lfuk0LdBK@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Sat, 20 Jun 2015 01:20:46 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
	Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Terje Bergström <tbergstrom@...dia.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] driver-core: defer all probes until late_initcall

On Friday, June 19, 2015 03:36:46 PM Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On 18 June 2015 at 23:50, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, June 17, 2015 03:42:12 PM Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> >> To decrease the chances of devices deferring their probes because of
> >> dependencies not having probed yet because of their drivers not having
> >> registered yet, delay all probing until the late initcall level.
> >>
> >> This will allow us to avoid deferred probes completely later by probing
> >> dependencies on demand, or by probing them in dependency order.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/base/dd.c | 8 +++++++-
> >>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> >> index a638bbb..18438aa 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> >> @@ -407,6 +407,12 @@ int driver_probe_device(struct device_driver *drv, struct device *dev)
> >>       if (!device_is_registered(dev))
> >>               return -ENODEV;
> >>
> >> +     /* Defer all probes until we start processing the queue */
> >> +     if (!driver_deferred_probe_enable) {
> >> +             driver_deferred_probe_add(dev);
> >
> > Do I think correctly that this will effectively force everybody to use deferred
> > probing?
> 
> Guess it depends on the meaning of "using deferred probing". It will
> defer the probe of the first device to late_initcall (which will
> happen much earlier in time than before), but afterwards all built-in
> drivers will be available and depending on the order in which we try
> to probe devices, none may actually ask to defer its probe.

So this will break things like the PNP system driver which relies on probing
stuff at the fs_initcall stage for correctness.  It may also break other
things with similar assumptions.


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/