linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] SLIMbus: Device management on SLIMbus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55839117.4010005@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Thu, 18 Jun 2015 21:48:39 -0600
From:	Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>
To:	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, broonie@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bp@...e.de, poeschel@...onage.de,
	treding@...dia.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
	andreas.noever@...il.com, alan@...ux.intel.com,
	mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, daniel@...ll.ch, oded.gabbay@....com,
	jkosina@...e.cz, sharon.dvir1@...l.huji.ac.il, joe@...ches.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, james.hogan@...tec.com,
	michael.opdenacker@...e-electrons.com, daniel.thompson@...aro.org,
	nkaje@...eaurora.org
CC:	kheitke@...ience.com, mlocke@...eaurora.org, agross@...eaurora.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] SLIMbus: Device management on SLIMbus

Hi Srini
Thank you for the review.
On 6/18/2015 3:23 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> Hi Sagar,
>
> On 14/06/15 06:49, Sagar Dharia wrote:
>> SLIMbus (Serial Low Power Interchip Media Bus) is a specification
>> developed by MIPI (Mobile Industry Processor Interface) alliance.
>> SLIMbus is a 2-wire implementation, which is used to communicate with
>> peripheral components like audio-codec.
>> SLIMbus uses Time-Division-Multiplexing to accommodate multiple data
>> channels, and control channel. Control channel has messages to do
>> device-enumeration, messages to send/receive control-data to/from
>> slimbus devices, messages for port/channel management, and messages to
>> do bandwidth allocation.
>> The framework supports multiple instances of the bus (1 controller per
>> bus), and multiple slave devices per controller.
>>
>> This patch does device enumeration, logical address assignment,
>> informing device when the device reports present/absent etc.
>> Reporting present may need the driver to do the needful (e.g. turning
>> on voltage regulators powering the device). So probe is called
>> if the device is added to board-info list for a controller.
>> Additionally device is probed when it reports present if that device
>> doesn't need any such steps mentioned above.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sagar Dharia <sdharia@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/Kconfig                 |   2 +
>>   drivers/Makefile                |   1 +
>>   drivers/slimbus/Kconfig         |   9 +
>>   drivers/slimbus/Makefile        |   4 +
>>   drivers/slimbus/slimbus.c       | 767 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/linux/mod_devicetable.h |  13 +
>>   include/linux/slimbus.h         | 393 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   7 files changed, 1189 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/slimbus/Kconfig
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/slimbus/Makefile
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/slimbus/slimbus.c
>>   create mode 100644 include/linux/slimbus.h
>>
>
> Good to see the slimbus patches :-)
>
> Can you also add patch to add MAINTAINERS to this?
>
> I like to try these patches on APQ8064 or any upstream Qcom platform, 
> Do you have other patches to test this on APQ8064 or any A family 
> SOCs/ B family SOCs which have upstream support?

I am testing this IFC6410 (APQ8064 based platform). I've the test-ioctl 
module that's work-in-progress. But to do some device-management like 
logical address assignment, you don't really need it (only this 
framework, and controller should be okay) since slimbus HW components 
inside the SOC reports present, enumerates when it boots. The IOCTL 
module binds to one of those devices, and makes sure probe, device-up, 
remove happen as expected.
>
> Also I keep getting lost as I start looking at code, Am missing 
> understanding of how these exported functions are going to be used by 
> consumers/clients/controllers?
> It would help if
> 1> document which explains how these apis are supposed to be used.
> 2> split up this patch into small patches, so that you can get good 
> review comments.

I have already split the files and have uploaded only device-management 
in this patch. This can't really be further broken while providing some 
useful functionality. There are in-fact multiple other patches coming up 
as described in the cover-letter. I will try to provide documentation 
(call-flows etc) next week when I upload next set of patches, and take 
care of some of comments you have given below.
Thanks
Sagar

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/