linux-kernel - Re: [-next] !irqd_can_balance() WARNINGs at irq_move_masked

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1506201002570.4107@nanos>
Date:	Sat, 20 Jun 2015 10:13:22 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
cc:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [-next] !irqd_can_balance() WARNINGs at irq_move_masked_irq()

On Sat, 20 Jun 2015, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:

> On (06/20/15 09:52), Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> [..]
> > 
> > Can you please send me the dmesg of the second patch as well?
> > 
> 
> I'm sorry, what second patch?

The one which I forgot to append when I replied yesterday. Appended now.

Thanks,

	tglx

----
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
index e2449cf38b06..c47aab35a17e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
@@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ static void hpet_msi_capability_lookup(unsigned int start_timer)
 			continue;
 
 		irq = hpet_assign_irq(hpet_domain, hdev, hdev->num);
-		if (irq < 0)
+		if (irq <= 0)
 			continue;
 
 		sprintf(hdev->name, "hpet%d", i);
diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index b1c7e8f46bfb..49f9b6d2edf6 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -209,6 +209,9 @@ int irq_set_affinity_locked(struct irq_data *data, const struct cpumask *mask,
 	if (!chip || !chip->irq_set_affinity)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
+	/* Figure out where the set affinitycall comes from */
+	WARN_ON(data->irq == 0);
+
 	if (irq_can_move_pcntxt(data)) {
 		ret = irq_do_set_affinity(data, mask, force);
 	} else {
diff --git a/kernel/irq/migration.c b/kernel/irq/migration.c
index dd203e276b07..00bbabbc144b 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/migration.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/migration.c
@@ -12,16 +12,17 @@ void irq_move_masked_irq(struct irq_data *idata)
 	if (likely(!irqd_is_setaffinity_pending(&desc->irq_data)))
 		return;
 
+	irqd_clr_move_pending(&desc->irq_data);
+
+
 	/*
 	 * Paranoia: cpu-local interrupts shouldn't be calling in here anyway.
 	 */
-	if (!irqd_can_balance(&desc->irq_data)) {
+	if (irqd_is_per_cpu(&desc->irq_data)) {
 		WARN_ON(1);
 		return;
 	}
 
-	irqd_clr_move_pending(&desc->irq_data);
-
 	if (unlikely(cpumask_empty(desc->pending_mask)))
 		return;
 





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/