[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4iA96Khapnm54JZkgiduoqyWo1x45r7EX=OU8cs1dyhsw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 09:31:02 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>,
"Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@...com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...ux.intel.com>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] nd_btt: atomic sector updates
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 3:03 AM, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>> +config ND_MAX_REGIONS
>> + int "Maximum number of regions supported by the sub-system"
>> + default 64
>> + ---help---
>> + A 'region' corresponds to an individual DIMM or an interleave
>> + set of DIMMs. A typical maximally configured system may have
>> + up to 32 DIMMs.
>> +
>> + Leave the default of 64 if you are unsure.
>
> Having static limits in Kconfig is a bad idea. What prevents you
> from handling any (reasonable) number dynamically?
Hmm, yes, this was a bad holdover from before we were using percpu
definitions for the lane locks. Now that it's converted we can kill
the static definition of nd_percpu_lane and just do an alloc_percpu()
for each region dynamically. Fixed in v2 and passing the test suite.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists