[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k2ux7x9p.fsf@belgarion.home>
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2015 20:05:06 +0200
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Mack <zonque@...il.com>,
Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] media: pxa_camera: trivial move of dma irq functions
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de> writes:
> On Sat, 20 Jun 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
>> Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de> writes:
>>
>> >> +static void pxa_camera_dma_irq(struct pxa_camera_dev *pcdev,
>> >> + enum pxa_camera_active_dma act_dma);
>> >> +
>> >> +static void pxa_camera_dma_irq_y(void *data)
>> >
>> > Wait, how is this patch trivial? You change pxa_camera_dma_irq_?()
>> > prototypes, which are used as PXA DMA callbacks. Does this mean, that
>> > either before or after this patch compilation is broken?
>>
>> Jeez you're right.
>> So I can either fold that with patch 4, or try to rework it somehow ...
>
> How about letting that patch do exactly what it says it does? Just move
> functions up in the file if you need them there, without changing them,
> and only change them when it's needed?
Deal, for next iteration.
Cheers.
--
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists