lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 21 Jun 2015 16:21:17 +0900
From:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Benoit Parrot <bparrot@...com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-SH <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] gpio: Retry deferred GPIO hogging on pin range change

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert+renesas@...der.be> wrote:
> If a GPIO driver uses gpiochip_add_pin_range() (which is usually the
> case for GPIO/PFC combos), the GPIO hogging mechanism configured from DT
> doesn't work:
>
>     requesting hog GPIO lcd0 (chip r8a7740_pfc, offset 176) failed
>
> The actual error code is -517 == -EPROBE_DEFER.
>
> The problem is that PFC+GPIO registration is handled in multiple steps:
>   1. pinctrl_register(),
>   2. gpiochip_add(),
>   3. gpiochip_add_pin_range().
>
> Configuration of the hogs is handled in gpiochip_add():
>
>     gpiochip_add
>         of_gpiochip_add
>             of_gpiochip_scan_hogs
>                 gpiod_hog
>                     gpiochip_request_own_desc
>                         __gpiod_request
>                             chip->request
>                                 pinctrl_request_gpio
>                                     pinctrl_get_device_gpio_range
>
> However, at this point the GPIO controller hasn't been added to
> pinctrldev_list yet, so the range can't be found, and the operation fails
> with -EPROBE_DEFER.
>
>   - Exchanging the order of the calls to gpiochip_add() and
>     gpiochip_add_pin_range() is not an option, as the latter depends on
>     initialization done by the former.
>   - Just moving the call of of_gpiochip_scan_hogs() from gpiochip_add()
>     to gpiochip_add_pin_range() is also not an option, as the latter is
>     optional, and thus not used by all drivers.
>
> Hence if of_gpiochip_scan_hogs() fails with -EPROBE_DEFER, call it
> again every time the pin range is changed, until it succeeded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> ---
> Questions:
>   - Is there a better solution to handle this?

I do not understand the issue well enough to propose a better
solution, but I really hope there is one. This turns GPIO into a
slightly bigger yarn mess that what it already is and does not help
understanding how probing is performed. Yielding in the middle of
adding hogs and re-trying later sounds like a recipe for issues like
hogs being added several times.

So I am not really fond of this, to be honest. The GPIO hogging
mechanism is still quite new, so there is certainly a way to fix such
issues by addressing the fundamental cause instead of duct taping it?

>
>   - Should the pin ranges be configured by passing an array of data to
>     gpiochip_add() instead of having calls to gpiochip_add_pin_range()?
>     That would require changing all drivers.
>
>   - What happens if you have multiple hogs in multiple ranges?
>     The first hog(s) may be configured multiple times.  Is that a problem?
>
>   - In one of the threads that discussed the GPIO hogging mechanism, Maxime
>     Ripard said: "Our pinctrl driver is also our GPIO driver, so they both
>     share the same node."
>     Maxime: Did you try GPIO hogging? Did it work?
>     If yes, which driver are you using? What's different compared to sh-pfc?
>     If no, did you get it to work?
>
> Thanks!
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c   | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c      |  1 +
>  include/linux/gpio/driver.h |  1 +
>  include/linux/of_gpio.h     |  2 ++
>  4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> index 9a0ec48a47375d18..90dd02b19f75c27c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-of.c
> @@ -205,13 +205,14 @@ static struct gpio_desc *of_get_gpio_hog(struct device_node *np,
>   * This is only used by of_gpiochip_add to request/set GPIO initial
>   * configuration.
>   */
> -static void of_gpiochip_scan_hogs(struct gpio_chip *chip)
> +static int of_gpiochip_scan_hogs(struct gpio_chip *chip)
>  {
>         struct gpio_desc *desc = NULL;
>         struct device_node *np;
>         const char *name;
>         enum gpio_lookup_flags lflags;
>         enum gpiod_flags dflags;
> +       int error;
>
>         for_each_child_of_node(chip->of_node, np) {
>                 if (!of_property_read_bool(np, "gpio-hog"))
> @@ -221,9 +222,12 @@ static void of_gpiochip_scan_hogs(struct gpio_chip *chip)
>                 if (IS_ERR(desc))
>                         continue;
>
> -               if (gpiod_hog(desc, name, lflags, dflags))
> -                       continue;
> +               error = gpiod_hog(desc, name, lflags, dflags);
> +               if (error == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +                       return error;
>         }
> +
> +       return 0;
>  }
>
>  /**
> @@ -416,8 +420,17 @@ static void of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(struct gpio_chip *chip)
>         }
>  }
>
> +void of_gpiochip_pin_range_changed(struct gpio_chip *chip)
> +{
> +       if (chip->hog_error) {
> +               /* Retry */
> +               chip->hog_error = of_gpiochip_scan_hogs(chip);
> +       }
> +}
> +
>  #else
>  static void of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(struct gpio_chip *chip) {}
> +void of_gpiochip_pin_range_changed(struct gpio_chip *chip) {}
>  #endif
>
>  void of_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip)
> @@ -436,7 +449,7 @@ void of_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *chip)
>         of_gpiochip_add_pin_range(chip);
>         of_node_get(chip->of_node);
>
> -       of_gpiochip_scan_hogs(chip);
> +       chip->hog_error = of_gpiochip_scan_hogs(chip);
>  }
>
>  void of_gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *chip)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> index 957ede5664cfe168..b0fe7a459d8835bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> @@ -759,6 +759,7 @@ int gpiochip_add_pin_range(struct gpio_chip *chip, const char *pinctl_name,
>
>         list_add_tail(&pin_range->node, &chip->pin_ranges);
>
> +       of_gpiochip_pin_range_changed(chip);
>         return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiochip_add_pin_range);
> diff --git a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
> index c8393cd4d44f2d87..9396b68dced2c5b1 100644
> --- a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
> +++ b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ struct gpio_chip {
>          * corresponding pins for gpio usage.
>          */
>         struct list_head pin_ranges;
> +       int hog_error;
>  #endif
>  };
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/of_gpio.h b/include/linux/of_gpio.h
> index 69dbe312b11b23f6..34421f17f4712d0b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of_gpio.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of_gpio.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ extern int of_mm_gpiochip_add(struct device_node *np,
>                               struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc);
>  extern void of_mm_gpiochip_remove(struct of_mm_gpio_chip *mm_gc);
>
> +extern void of_gpiochip_pin_range_changed(struct gpio_chip *chip);
>  extern void of_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *gc);
>  extern void of_gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *gc);
>  extern int of_gpio_simple_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> @@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ static inline int of_gpio_simple_xlate(struct gpio_chip *gc,
>         return -ENOSYS;
>  }
>
> +static inline void of_gpiochip_pin_range_changed(struct gpio_chip *chip) { }
>  static inline void of_gpiochip_add(struct gpio_chip *gc) { }
>  static inline void of_gpiochip_remove(struct gpio_chip *gc) { }
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists